Minimum Grade
Published minimum grades show applicants are entering a selective admissions process before the supplementary review.

Practice the McMaster Engineering and Computer Science supplementary application with 3 timed video responses and 1 written response, then get AI feedback on communication, problem-solving, and teamwork for a stronger Kira Talent submission.
McMaster Engineering I and Computer Science I use a competitive supplementary application completed through Kira Talent. Strong preparation matters because applicants respond asynchronously to timed video and written questions that are not shared in advance.
Published minimum grades show applicants are entering a selective admissions process before the supplementary review.
Most of the supplementary application is assessed through timed video answers, so clear speaking practice is essential.
Engineering I and Computer Science I list limited total enrolment, reinforcing the value of a polished submission.
Candidates are assessed on how clearly they communicate, solve problems, reflect under time pressure, and demonstrate readiness for engineering and computer science study. Feedback uses role-relevant skills such as technical communication, analytical reasoning, teamwork capability, learning agility, and ethical responsibility.
Scores reflect the core skills demonstrated in timed video and written responses.
These dimensions show how your video response is assessed across the program's configured scoring criteria.
Start a timed practice session, answer role-specific questions, review your AI feedback, then practice again to improve your ability scores.
These examples come from the program question bank where available and show the style of practice questions.
From the session itself to the per-question breakdown, every feature is built around measurable practice.
Realistic practice that builds confidence
Practice with the same pacing and response format used by this program.
Hear or read each question before responding, depending on the program setup.
Each session pulls from the configured question bank.
Review what you said and how you delivered it after every session.
Per-question analysis tied to the scoring criteria
See your overall readiness and criterion-level scores.
Understand the exact issue in each response.
Turn weak spots into concrete next practice goals.
Repeat sessions and track your performance over time.
Practice works best when it is spoken, repeated, and tied to feedback you can act on.

Practice to

Practice to

Practice to
Learners who used MYLS to turn practice reports into targeted improvement.








Outcomes are illustrative and may be anonymized.
This program evaluates answer quality, communication, fit, and the skills needed for this opportunity.
Use them to understand the expected style, then start a real session to receive scored feedback.
Yes. Repeated sessions help you build consistency and compare feedback over time.
You receive a structured report with scores, strengths, gaps, and suggestions for the next attempt.